The war of words....Is it medical tourism or medical travel?

I just read Constantine Constantinides informative and latest missive on medical tourism. Constantine runs Healthcare Cybernetics and is one of the "wise heads" of medical tourism.
Constantine says:

"I am getting fed up with industry newcomers (the “Johnny-come-latelys”), industry outsiders and the self-important upstarts who take issue with the word Tourism – claiming it is not “grand” enough for them to be associated with.They propose replacing it with the word “Travel”. Some even suggest we dump everything and start talking of Global Health (as if healthcare has not been global for ages).......I do not like the “tourism” word – but neither do I like the several suggested alternatives"

He makes some interesting points:

"The word Tourism is derived from Tour - from Anglo-French tur, tourn turning, circuit – a there and back journey.Travel may not include a “back”.

So, here's my two pennyworth (English idiom!).

Let's start with Google's view. Why? Because Google reflects the way that people use words.

I did a search on Google UK for various terms:
A search for medical tourism generated 19,700,000 results. (Our Treatment Abroad and related web sites secure three of the top ten positions. A pat on the back for our search engine optimisation team!)
A search for medical travel generated 73,300,000 results.
A search for health tourism generated 36,600,000 results.(Treatment Abroad is no 2 for this search. Another pat on the back for SEO.)
A search for health travel generated 250,000,000 results. A search for global health generated 133,000,000 results.But we probably need to be a bit more specific. By putting the phrase in quotes e.g. "medical tourism", Google only returns results for the exact phrase: "medical tourism" generated 5,290,000 results.
"medical travel" generated 443,000 results.
"health tourism" generated 798,000 results.
"health travel" generated 505,000 results.
"global health" generated 3,220,000 results

The previous analysis tells you what words and phrases are most frequently used on web sites indexed by Google. But what terms do people use when searching? Here's another analysis. This time we look at the average monthly search volumes on Google worldwide:

medical tourism - 90,500 searches per month health tourism - 14,800 searches per monthhealth travel - 165,000 searches per monthglobal health - 135,000 searches per month

And the winner is?

It's probably medical tourism....

Why? Because it's the phrase that's in common usage, whether we like it or not. It's what the media use when they write about the industry. It's what the man on the Clapham omnibus would probably say. Is it the best phrase to use? Probably not.

I prefer medical travel!

View the original article here

The slumbering giant of medical travel?

Where do you think the international patients' centre shown above is? Singapore? Thailand? Malaysia? India? Korea?

Read on to find out...

This week’s International Medical Travel Journal covers a recent announcement by the UK Department of Health (See: Liberated UK hospitals to attract medical tourists) that it plans to remove the cap on the proportion of income that NHS hospitals can earn from private surgery. NHS hospitals are allowed to treat private patients (both domestic and international patients) in addition to their primary responsibility for serving the needs of the UK public.

Many NHS hospitals have private patient wards or dedicated units which benefit from their location close to the extensive clinical resources and medical technology which are available with an NHS general or teaching hospital. These are well supported by private patients but these NHS units have been restricted in terms of their revenue potential; across the UK, NHS hospitals were not allowed to generate more than 2% of their income from private paying patients. Some individual hospitals were allowed to generate a much greater proportion but were still limited in their revenue earning potential.

At medical tourism conferences around the world, the UK gets barely a mention. Yet it ranks in the top ten destination countries in terms of medical tourist numbers and probably in the top five in terms of revenue generated (Source: Team Tourism Consulting 2010). London continues to attract high value medical travellers seeking expertise and quality rather than the lowest prices. The average treatment cost for these patients is around £20,000, and for individual patients it can be much more. London also benefits significantly from the related expenditure of these medical travellers e.g. accommodation for friends and family during these extended patient stays.

Private patient facilities at leading London teaching hospitals such as Moorfields Eye Hospital, Great Ormond Street Children's Hospital, Royal Brompton & Harefield Hospitals, Kings College Hospital, Royal Marsden Hospital, and Guy’s & St Thomas’ Hospital have always been attractive to international patients and they compete with other international centres of excellence in countries such as the USA and Germany . Indeed, these NHS private patient facilities earn more from international private patients (medical tourists) than they do from UK private patients.

The Harris International Patient Centre at Great Ormond Street (pictured above) is a good example. The Centre has 130 staff, working with over 170 clinicians in Great Ormond Street Children's Hospital. It’s bigger than most international patient departments serving “medical tourists” that you would find anywhere in the world. And it’s very busy. But, until now Great Ormond Street and similar NHS run international patient facilities have been limited by the private patient income cap.

That is about to change... London “the slumbering giant of medical travel” may wake up to some of the newly emerging opportunities presented by the international patient market:
The London hospitals mentioned above have a long and impressive track record in attracting international patients.
They were involved in medical tourism long before the term was invented.
And they are able to provide quality and prices that will be attractive to many emerging source markets for medical travel. For example, if US derived medical tourism does eventually take off, and American patients can make significant savings by travelling to London for major surgery (not far short of those available in Singapore or Thailand), would London be an attractive option? Same language (...almost), same culture (...almost).

This American who travelled to Wales for surgery may be the start of a growing trend....

View the original article here